- Beiträge
- 4.129
Preliminary note: without a motor my Agilo probably weighs about as much as the QV.
What troubles me with graphs is that the scale on both axis should be so: for every metre climbed in the vertical axis then 100 metres distance on the horizontal. I see 155 metres reached (but in fact many more climbed) over 8 km in your example above. The average gradient works out to 1.94%.
On the main road to Irun there are 3.4 km at 3% average one way and 2.7 km at 4% average on the way back. Of course there are portions at 7% and that is why my Agilo has a motor and thus much more heavy than your QV. Maybe if I was 35 years old and at the top of my fitness level weighing 76 kg I wouldn't need a motor?
Just for fun a graph from about 10 km from here:
What troubles me with graphs is that the scale on both axis should be so: for every metre climbed in the vertical axis then 100 metres distance on the horizontal. I see 155 metres reached (but in fact many more climbed) over 8 km in your example above. The average gradient works out to 1.94%.
On the main road to Irun there are 3.4 km at 3% average one way and 2.7 km at 4% average on the way back. Of course there are portions at 7% and that is why my Agilo has a motor and thus much more heavy than your QV. Maybe if I was 35 years old and at the top of my fitness level weighing 76 kg I wouldn't need a motor?
Just for fun a graph from about 10 km from here: